Month: February 2021

Is this the first move for major changes in the energy industry?

We have discussed the impact a changing energy industry is having on the Queensland Government owned energy companies and the impact on AGL. Generation, transmission, and retail companies are producing lower profits and their assets are being written down in value due to the subdued electricity prices going forward.

AGL Energy has been the first company to raise the option of breaking itself up as it positions itself to operate in a landscape of low electricity prices. Driven by the State and Federal Governments underwriting new clean generation, resulting in the high penetration of renewable energy in the National Energy Market (NEM). With this also comes a shift toward a decarbonised generation fleet to meet customers’ requests for low carbon and renewable energy.

With profits dropping 27%, AGL has cut its spending and costs after a first half loss of $2.29 billion. AGL have also revisited their future expectation and now they predict that prices will remain low into the future because of the increase in renewable generation in the market.

A Gentalier is a company that is vertically integrated from its generation through to retail.

The key reasoning for breaking up AGL and other similar businesses is that they operate as a Gentailer. This model has been very successful for many years with the Gentailer generating cheap power from coal fired power stations and selling to its retail customers at a premium price. With the change to the generation mix various parts of the Gentailers have opposing drivers. Companies like AGL and the Queensland Government owned generators have large fleets of coal fired generation and relatively small amounts of renewable generation. But, the customers want to source their power from renewables.

Overseas energy companies have responded to the opposing challenges and have split their businesses between customer focused solutions, large scale renewable generation and the carbon intense coal and gas fired generation fleet. The carbon intensive parts of their businesses have been generally separated from the core business to allow the carbon intensive assets to be retired over time.

Breaking up their business into the retail company and the generation company is another option like the structure across Australia before vertical integration.

A third option is to create two retail front ends.

• One backed by clean energy and
• One backed by carbon intense energy.

Depending on the price point, the clean energy retail would flourish and the carbon intense business would diminish. While all this talk of different business structures is circulating it is likely that future retail solutions will also include other products like telecommunications and internet. All provided as the one package with electricity from one retailer.

In another signal to the changing landscape, AGL have identified $150 million of operating cost savings to deliver in 2021-22, with $100 million reduction of stay in business capital expenditure between now and 2023. An increased growth budget to focus on battery investments and the Crib Point LNG import terminal in Victoria. The cost of LNG and investment in new gas fired generation is also on hold as AGL investigates the details of New South Wales Government’s energy infrastructure road map.

“Going green” has so many benefits – not just your local area but for the whole planet. Having green credentials is also great for your corporate social responsibility and is something you can brag about on your website.

Switch to green energy with Edge Utilities. Currently, Australia produces around 23.5% and 33 terawatt-hours (TWh) of its electricity from renewables. We still have a long way to go to achieve the Australian governments commitment of greater than 40% by 2030. We are now producing more green energy than ever before and the percentage of people who are in favour of using renewable energy in the Australia is rising.

Green Business Energy

Here in Australia, the government has set an ambitious target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 26-28% by 2030. It’s a pretty big ask, but by making significant changes, individuals and businesses can all play their part in making it happen.

Businesses use far more energy than individual households. Just imagine what could happen if your business joined thousands or even millions of others worldwide in switching to renewably sourced energy? Combined with improvements to energy efficiency, we can make a big difference.

What is Renewable Business Energy?

Renewable energy does just what it says on the packet. Unlike fossil fuels, these are energy supplies that won’t run out because they are renewable. Better still, this kind of energy production doesn’t harm the environment.

But where does renewable power come from, and how is it created? Well, it includes energy sources derived from solar panels, wind turbines, hydropower and biomass energy, such as plant or animal material used as fuel to produce electricity or heat.

Individuals and organisations can also generate their own green energy, using feed-in tariff incentives to make money by selling power back to the grid. These tariffs are based on the electricity generated by a renewable energy system which is used in the property, such as solar.

Some of the best solar feed-in tariffs in Queensland are as high as 18 cents per kilowatt hour (kWh) to eligible customers. The next best FiT rate comes at 17c/kWh and15c/kWh apiece.

This is usually paid by electricity grid, system or market operators and often known as a Power Purchasing Agreement (PPA).

Do you know what makes up the largest portion of your utility bill?

Electricity derived from the use of fossil fuels, such as coal, petroleum, and natural gas. These are non-renewable sources of energy. Once they are gone, they are gone – and the earth only has a limited supply. There are various estimates as to when we will have used up all supplies of fossil fuels, but many agree around the year 2060 isn’t too far off the mark.

We have a limited amount of time to make the switch to 100% renewable electricity.

Low or no-carbon electricity can be generated by solar or wind power, or by biomass. Biomass is used in Australia mainly for low-cost heating, especially in households without access to natural gas for heating. Currently we have more than 65 sites using landfill gas to generate electricity and a further 50 that operate away from landfill dumps.

Edge Utilities can help you to seek out the best green electricity tariffs for your needs, at exclusive prices you won’t find anywhere else.

T: 1800 334 336 E: save@edgeutilities.com.au 

Over the last couple of years solar was the hot topic when discussing projects. Now battery storage is what everyone is talking about. From large scale projects, to smaller scale installations on the roof of households, commercial businesses, such as factories and now solar shaded car parks! Batteries are the new option everyone wants.

But………………………………… the question is why?

Because the easiest form of renewable generation to install is solar and as solar produces electricity in the parts of the day when prices are at their lowest, there is limited commercial value to the system owners.

In some cases when prices are zero and sometimes negative during the solar hour the end user is better off by taking power off the grid and not using the power generated by the solar.

For commercial sized installations, the operator sells the output over a longer term to payback the cost of development and construction but, margins are getting tight. There is a need to take advantage of the part of the day when prices are higher, to improve the financial viability of the projects. The solution to this is to time shift the solar generation into the times when solar is not available and prices are higher. This is done by storing the solar energy in the battery and discharging in those hours on either side of the solar shape. This is usually when most people are coming home from work.

In small scale projects, such as a household rooftop set up, a 5-kilowatt (kW) system will generate about 12 kilowatt/hour(kWh) per day. Home batteries are normally sized to about 10kWh, considering the efficiency of charging the battery the system will not charge the battery to 100% each day.

Most household’s consumption is 5kWh/day so, because of the consumption and the solar generation, it would take up to 3 days to fully charge the battery. This would result in the household paying for the solar and battery setup and now paying to import electricity from the grid for their consumption.

There are two key areas to explore regarding battery storage.

1. If batteries become more popular the cost of each battery comes down and makes the commercial decision to install batteries easier.

2. Installation of a control system that can manage the solar / battery operation and optimise the system to the benefit of the end user. (we believe this is the more important decision)

With the installation of 45 gigawatt (GW) of batteries expected in Australia by 2025, there will either be a lot of wasted capital or a great resource to manage the intermittent generation and consumption across the NEM. However, with financial returns underpinning the investment of projects there will be skewing towards technology for the answer.

A serious solution to the dilemma of individuals desiring renewable generation to power their homes or businesses, extracting the value from the renewable energy across the day when the renewable resource may not be generating, and the economies of scale required to make battery storage viable, is the sharing of the renewable resource and storage capabilities across multiple households.

Edge has strategic partnerships in place to provide customised solutions to allow end users to receive the benefits of renewable generation and the use of battery storage.

We are using cutting edge technology to maximise the efficient use of the renewable energy and reduce the cost to end users.

We are installing Electric Vehicle (EV) charging stations into some of our Strata/Body Corporate schemes, to maximise the use of renewable energy produced during the day from onsite generation. This allows tenants to charge their vehicles overnight rather than charging from the grid.

Contact us to find out how we can provide the solutions to help you save money and the planet.

1800 334 336 OR EMAIL save@edgeutilities.com.au

Last week the Queensland Audit Office (QAO) published a report on the performance of its Energy entities. The report summarises the financial and risk results of the government owned Generators, Transmission and Distribution businesses and its Retailers.

The audit report focused on a few areas including:

• the strength of each entities IT security
• the financial performance
• the profitability from the sector and it’s continuing decline.

It is noted as a whole, the sector still returns a profit, be it at lower levels, to the government shareholders. Some parts of the sector i.e. Generators and transmission are not performing very well.

The report also acknowledges that the energy sector is undergoing significant changes and there is a need for the system to adapt to continue to supply affordable and reliable energy.

At a high level, profits across the six entities are down 88% to only $204M. Returns to the government shareholders were down 54% to $1B however, $1.5B was returned to customers, an increase of 37% on the previous year.

Over the last 4 years the return from the transmission, distribution and retail entities have been dropping at a steady rate while generation was returning $600M – $800M profit to the shareholders.

2019-20 has seen a rapid drop in profits from the generator sector. In Queensland, the State Government controls 68% of the generation assets and as a result have been exposed to the low spot and contract prices in recent years. This has resulted in a net loss of $367M for the generators.

Low Electricity prices have also impacted the value of the Government assets with over $1B being written down across the Power Stations.

The largest write down was Stanwell at $720M or 19% of their assets followed by CS Energy writing down $353M in value and CleanCo writing down $35M which includes the relatively modern Swanbank E Gas fired combined cycle generator that now was zero value. Swanbank E has an effective life until 2036 so in reality CleanCo expects net losses from operating this asset.

With the Queensland Governments exposure to such a large coal fired generator fleet, the shift to renewables and the retirement of its coal assets are a key issue for the government over the next 26 years of planned coal retirements. The QAO plans to report to the government on how the energy entities are managing the transmission from coal to renewable energy.

As we eagerly await the government’s plan to transition to more renewable energy in the generation mix, the question needs to be asked, can the coal fleet survive for another 26 years?

The earliest retirement in Queensland is Callide B in 2027. If the losses seen this year continue and potential increase over the coming years, it does not look viable to continue operating the coal fired generators apart from providing the much-needed system security to the grid.

It is not just the Queensland Government owned assets that are affected by the subdued prices. AGL wrote down $2.68B value of its assets as their realisation of previously expensive PPA’s from the wind and the forecast long term down turn in market prices. .

AGL have recently revised their view of the market where they previously believed the current downturn in prices would be short lived and prices would return to historic levels as a signal for new generation investment. AGL have stated they expect a sustained and material reduction in the prices of power and renewable energy certificates. Of the $2.68B write down, $1.92B was attributed to onerous wind farm contracts signed between 2006 and 2012. Wholesale prices and renewable energy certificates were trading at levels, much higher than today and into the future. Adding to the write down numbers, environmental remediation of site resulted in an extra $1.11B in cost and impairment of the thermal station added just over $1B.

An announcement was made on Friday by CEP Energy to build the World’s Biggest Battery. This comes on the back of similar announcements from other market participants in recent weeks.

This announcement is a little bit more political as the location of the 1,200MW battery is in the same location as where Scott Morrison proposes to build a new 1,000MW Gas Powered generator.

The project at Kurri Kurri in the Hunter Valley will add to CEP’s plan to build a large-scale rooftop solar and batteries VPP including 1,500MW of generation and a 400MW battery over the next 5 years. The location has the benefits of being located in an industrial precinct with connection into the NEM via an existing sub-station.

The location of the big battery is ideal for the connection of any form of generation which led to the site selection for the Morrison Governments Gas turbine but as CEP is chaired by former NSW Labor Premier Morris Lemmer and its CEO is an ex-Macquarie bank executive the reasoning for the site could be political.

If the big battery is installed it will effectively limit the capability for the federal government to build its Gas turbine.

Chairman Morris Lemma has endorsed the NSW Clean Energy Roadmap and highlighted that batteries would play a major role in filling the gaps left by the gradual retirement of coal and gas-fired generation assets.

The Kurri Kurri battery will be built in stages, with first generation expected in 2023. By 2023, if all planned batteries get built, the Kurri Kurri battery will be competing with AGLs suite of 1,000MW battery and other batteries across the NEM totaling over 2,500MW.

Last week AEMO published its Quarterly Energy Dynamic report. Our Energy Experts are currently analysing the report and will provide a comprehensive summary in the next week.

The last quarter of 2020 saw some interesting trends. We saw the continual increase in wind and solar generation across the National Energy Market (NEM), reaching 20% for the first time. A deepening of the “duck curve” shape of the demand curve and the prolonged periods of negative prices mixed with volatility over the evening peaks.

Wind and solar generators are starting to learn how to operate effectively during the low-price periods, through bidding strategies or clauses in there Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs), while the thermal generators have learnt how to reduce their exposure to low prices whilst having the flexibility to ramp up during the high price period or when volatility occurs.

As expected, the regions with a higher penetration of intermittent generation like wind and solar, experienced a greater share of negative prices. Currently South Australia leads the way in the percentage of renewable generation installations but in the last quarter Victoria installed the most Wind and Solar.

With high prices in some regions and the increased occurrence of negative prices, intermittent generation altered their trading strategies by increasing the offer price to ensure the units were not dispatched at negative prices. The result of these trading strategies is that spot prices increase, and negative prices occur less.

Edge has been expecting this behavior to occur for some time. This behavior was also more prominent in the newer installations, mainly driven by market predictive software used for rebidding and the commercial drivers written into new PPAs to increase the returns from the assets.

While the wind and solar developers have steadily been increasing their presence, the thermal generators have been busy changing their operations to allow the normally inflexible coal fired generators to operate at lower minimum levels and change load rapidly to meet the change in demand and spot price during the ramp up to the evening peak.

AEMO observes that Loy Yang A showed increased flexibility by also shifting marginal capacity to higher price bands from below $10/MWh to $35/MWh so they would not dispatch volumes above their minimum load. This also leads to an increase in the spot price.

Curtailment of wind and solar increased in the quarter to 5.2% which equals an average of 191MW. Most developers should have factored in this reduction in their business models. For the ones that have not, they may be affected commercially.

In the Quarter 4 (Q4) of 2020 overall curtailment remained the same as Q3 however, economic curtailment increased. Curtailment for system strength decreased significantly as a result of fewer periods of low demand in North Queensland and changes made to the connection settings at Mt Emerald Wind Farm. The largest factor resulting in curtailment was transmission issues for system outages, grid congestion and network constraints. Curtailment due to transmission issues resulted in an average of 80MW of the 191MW being constrained in the last quarter.

Some interesting statistics out of the report that we will expand on in the coming weeks are:

• Highest share of NEM renewable energy compared to operational demand – 36% of NEM operational demand at 0930 hours on 3 October 2020.
• Highest grid-solar output– 3,210 MW at 1230 hours on 30 November 2020.
• Quarterly average for grid scale Solar of 1,018MW.
• Quarterly average of grid scale Wind generation was 2,441MW